Hi Rad,
This is something I've been thinking about for a while. I am aware of the clear teachings about the incojuncts that manifest within the gibbous and full phase.
However, when we have a yod formation, sometimes depending on the speed of the planets relative to one antoher, we might have both legs of the yod being a gibbous inconjunct to the apax planet, or both being a full phase inconjunct.
I'm wondering if you have any reflections on this in your own experience. When workingw with a yod, do you make the apex planet the stationary point from which we calculate the phase, or do you work with the actual phase between the planets?
As an example:
Chiron in Taurus forms an inconjunct to:
Venus in Libra (which is a gibbous inconjunct from Chiron to Venus)
Neptune in Sag (also gibbous from Neptune to Chiron)
VS, making Chiron the apex planet regardless of it's speed. In this case:
Venus in Libra would still be inconjunct
Neptune in Sag would now become a full phase inconjunct
I'd like to understand more about how you suggest working with the relative difference in the inconjunct phases when dealing with the yod pattern as a whole.
Hi Ari,
It is the actual phase between two planets that correlates to how they manifest. In other
words, the apex planet is not used at the baseline as the determinant for the phases between two planets.
Thus, to understand how any two planets that are inconjunct to one another is to understand the actual phase that exists between them.
God Bless, Rad
Ok thank you Rad,
That makes sense and just keeps it consistant: keeping to the phases, even with aspect patterns such as the yod.